cfec11bb46
Some checks failed
ci/woodpecker/push/woodpecker Pipeline failed
stop-slop, taste-skill, terrashark had embedded .git dirs causing Woodpecker clone to fail on submodule update.
59 lines
1.6 KiB
Markdown
59 lines
1.6 KiB
Markdown
# Before/After Examples
|
|
|
|
## Example 1: Throat-Clearing + Binary Contrast
|
|
|
|
**Before:**
|
|
> "Here's the thing: building products is hard. Not because the technology is complex. Because people are complex. Let that sink in."
|
|
|
|
**After:**
|
|
> "Building products is hard. Technology is manageable. People aren't."
|
|
|
|
**Changes:** Removed opener, binary contrast structure, and emphasis crutch. Direct statements.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Example 2: Filler + Unnecessary Reassurance
|
|
|
|
**Before:**
|
|
> "It turns out that most teams struggle with alignment. The uncomfortable truth is that nobody wants to admit they're confused. And that's okay."
|
|
|
|
**After:**
|
|
> "Teams struggle with alignment. Nobody admits confusion."
|
|
|
|
**Changes:** Cut hedging ("most"), removed throat-clearing phrases, deleted permission-granting ending.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Example 3: Business Jargon Stack
|
|
|
|
**Before:**
|
|
> "In today's fast-paced landscape, we need to lean into discomfort and navigate uncertainty with clarity. This matters because your competition isn't waiting."
|
|
|
|
**After:**
|
|
> "Move faster. Your competition is."
|
|
|
|
**Changes:** Eliminated jargon entirely. Core message in six words.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Example 4: Dramatic Fragmentation
|
|
|
|
**Before:**
|
|
> "Speed. Quality. Cost. You can only pick two. That's it. That's the tradeoff."
|
|
|
|
**After:**
|
|
> "Speed, quality, cost—pick two."
|
|
|
|
**Changes:** Single sentence. No performative emphasis.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Example 5: Rhetorical Setup
|
|
|
|
**Before:**
|
|
> "What if I told you that the best teams don't optimize for productivity? Here's what I mean: they optimize for learning. Think about it."
|
|
|
|
**After:**
|
|
> "The best teams optimize for learning, not productivity."
|
|
|
|
**Changes:** Direct claim. No rhetorical scaffolding.
|